nanopoética

# Noopunk: Intermediary Between a Woke Neoplatonic-Spinozist Pantheism and a Satanic Bataillean-Nietzschean Acceleration

## Abstract

Noopunk presents itself as an emerging oculture that operates as "postcapitalist voodoo," a magical-symbolic practice of resistance on the threshold of capitalist collapse. This article analyzes noopunk as a dialectical synthesis between two antagonistic poles: on one hand, a Neoplatonic-Spinozist pantheism captured by woke ideology, which emphasizes immanent harmony, identitarian inclusion, and ontological perseverance; on the other, a satanic acceleration inspired by Bataille and Nietzsche, which celebrates wasteful excess, destructive sovereignty, and the accelerated implosion of the system. Through concepts such as **Pradhāna** (primordial semiotic excess), **meshtification** (retrocausal infection of reality), and **micellar semiotics**, noopunk resolves the tension in a performative ritual that hacks power signs to generate creative autonomy. Based on primary sources from the blog noopunk.wordpress.com and key philosophical references.

**Keywords:** noopunk, postcapitalist voodoo, Spinozist pantheism, accelerationism, Bataille, woke, meshtification.

# Table of Contents

0. Abstract  
1. Introduction: Emergence of Noopunk as a Contemporary Oculture  
2. The Harmonic Pole: Woke Neoplatonic-Spinozist Pantheism  
   2.1. Spinoza and Immanent Pantheism  
   2.2. Neoplatonism and Divine Emanation  
   2.3. Woke Capture: Identity, Inclusion, and Capitalist Realism  
3. The Wasteful Pole: Satanic Bataillean-Nietzschean Acceleration  
   3.1. Nietzsche: Eternal Return and Overman  
   3.2. Bataille: Excess, Sovereignty, and General Economy  
   3.3. Satanic Accelerationism: Land, CCRU, and Capital Implosion  
4. The Intermediary: Noopunk as Postcapitalist Voodoo  
   4.1. Definition and Origin of Noopunk  
   4.2. Symbolic Voodoo: Resignification of Signs and Digital Rituals  
   4.3. Pradhāna, Meshtification, and Micellar Semiotics  
   4.4. Dialectical Synthesis: Excessive Harmony and Harmonic Waste  
5. Comparative Analysis: Table of Oppositions and Convergences  
6. Political and Ontological Implications  
7. Conclusions  
8. References
### 1. Introduction: Emergence of Noopunk as a Contemporary Oculture

On the threshold of the symbolic collapse of late capitalism—characterized by a saturation of hegemonic images and discourses trapped in **capitalist realism** (as diagnosed by Mark Fisher in his critique of "capitalist realism" as an ideology that presents capitalism as the only viable horizon)—noopunk emerges as a contemporary oculture of ritualistic and performative resistance. It is not a mere recycled punk aesthetic or a nostalgic revival of past subcultures, but a **magical-symbolic praxis** that invokes critical and ancestral energies to destabilize the dominant semiotic order. Explicitly defined in its foundational texts as **"postcapitalist voodoo,"** noopunk configures itself as a theoretical-practical device that fuses punk irreverence with practices of collective relibidinalization, responding to the **"affective insolvency"** generated by semiocapitalism—a stage in which, according to Franco "Bifo" Berardi, capital feeds not only on material production but on the excess of signs, images, and discourses that paralyze desire and collective action.

The term "voodoo" in this context does not refer to ethnographic literalism or exoticization, but to an operative metaphor: a ritual hacking of signs—corporate logos, captured political narratives, surveillance algorithms—to resignify them from creative autonomy and libidinal dissent. Inspired by Haitian voodoo as a tradition of resistance against colonial oppression, noopunk adapts it to the postcapitalist horizon, transforming it into a **"hyperstitional catalyst"** (a concept from the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU) of Nick Land and Sadie Plant, where hyperstition designates ideas or narratives that, by circulating culturally, self-constitute into reality, projecting alternative futures into the present). Thus, noopunk not only deconstructs power symbols—for example, altering Nike's slogan "Just Do It" into "Just Don’t Do It" to expose its ideological emptiness—but invokes them in collective rituals that reactivate repressed libido, countering the **"neoliberal semiofascism"** that, through lies of scarcity and competition, captures desire in cycles of passive accumulation.

This emergence is framed in a precise chronological context: the foundational blog noopunk.wordpress.com, launched in February 2025, marks the public debut with the seminal entry "NOOPUNK: A Postcapitalist Voodoo" (February 18, 2025), followed by texts like "The Call" (February 17, 2025), exploring the initial invocation of this current. In subsequent months, it evolves into more elaborate practices, as documented in YouTube videos about "The Fisher Box" (February 2025), a noopunk device paying tribute to Mark Fisher through aesthetic interventions fusing **acid communism**—Fisher's proposal to use psychedelia to destabilize capitalist mental structures and open paths to collective revolutionary thinking—with digital voodoo rituals. This temporality, aligned with the intensification of ecological, digital, and affective crises in 2025, positions noopunk as an imminent response to the **"libidinal paralysis"** of the present, extending to platforms like X (@no0punk) and collaborative spaces like noopunk.xyz, where heteronymic writing and theory-fiction become hyperstition laboratories.

Ontologically and politically, noopunk situates itself at the intersection of speculative philosophy, theory-fiction, and collective praxis, drawing from an eclectic tapestry of influences: Spinoza's immanent pantheism and its *conatus* as libidinal perseverance; Georges Bataille's sovereign excess in *The Accursed Share*, inspiring ritual waste against capital's restricted economy; Nietzschean will to power, reinterpreted in punk irreverence that affirms life beyond moral dichotomies; the primordial matter *Pradhāna* from Hindu Sāṃkhya, as a "semiotic soup" in ebullition disintegrating fixed signs for resistant emergences; and CCRU accelerationism, inverted into an **"acid accelerationism"** redirecting techno-capitalist implosion toward collective liberation rather than nihilistic collapse. Other veins include Baudrillardian critique of sign disintegration, Debordian spectacle, and Deleuzo-Guattarian subjective fragmentation, all articulated in a **"poetics of excess"** deconstructing the capitalist "funnel"—a semiotic machine swallowing desires and bodies to spit them out as obedient commodities.

Noopunk's radical novelty lies in its proposal of a dialectical **"intermediary point"**: a mediation between the harmonic pole of Neoplatonic-Spinozist pantheism captured by woke ideology—where identitarian inclusion and diluted spiritual harmony paradoxically reinforce neoliberal symbolic control—and the wasteful pole of satanic Bataillean-Nietzschean acceleration, celebrating destructive chaos and excessive sovereignty up to techno-chaotic singularity. This synthesis does not resolve tension in passive neutrality but in performative **"harmonic excess"**: rituals like psychedelic consciousness sessions in abandoned spaces, symbolic consumption strikes, or blockchain-voodoo invocations (e.g., "loa-code" as hacker fragments redistributing power) transforming Bataillean waste into postcapitalist autonomy tools. In the foundational manifesto's words: "Noopunk articulates itself from debates around demystifying power structures and deconstructing capitalism's symbols [...] This postcapitalist voodoo [...] would be a resistance ritual using sign magic to dismantle neoliberal semiotic fascism."

This article, prepared for dissemination on Academia.edu, rigorously investigates that dialectical mediation, arguing that noopunk—through concepts like hyperstition, relibidinalization, and theory-fiction—offers not only an ontological critique of capitalist realism but a practical grammar for emancipatory futures. By expanding this introduction, we aim to contextualize its emergence as a living oculture, inviting readers and practitioners to participate in its hyperstitional propagation.

### 2. The Harmonic Pole: Woke Neoplatonic-Spinozist Pantheism

The harmonic pole represents an ontology of immanent unity and collective perseverance, conceiving reality as a continuous flow of equivalent modes without transcendental ruptures or disruptive excesses. Rooted in Spinozist pantheism and Neoplatonic emanationism, this vision finds contemporary expression in woke ideology: an identitarian politics of recognition that, while intending to subvert power, ends up reinforcing capitalist realism by diluting dissent into inclusive symbolic adjustments. In the noopunk framework, this pole stands as the "passive side" of postcapitalist dialectics: a harmony offering ontological consolation but lacking ritual potency to pierce capital's semiotic veil. Noopunk voodoo mediates it by saturating it with excess, transforming it into a liberating tool and avoiding capture in "passive perseverance" perpetuating the status quo. Below, we break down its philosophical components and current ideological distortion, contrasting them with noopunk praxis as an antidote.

#### 2.1. Spinoza and Immanent Pantheism

At the heart of this pole beats Baruch Spinoza's (1632-1677) philosophy, whose *Ethics* (1677) postulates a single infinite substance—*Deus sive Natura*—from which everything emanates as modes or attributes. There is no Cartesian dualism between mind and body, nor theistic transcendence; reality is immanent, a continuous fold where God and Nature identify in radical pantheity. The guiding principle is *conatus*: each being's innate effort to persevere in its essence, a vital impulse generating active affects (joy, potency) or passive ones (sadness, servitude). This harmonic ontology implies an ethics of rational comprehension: by knowing substance as self-caused, the individual frees itself from enslaving passions and accesses *beatitudo*, a collective beatitude in intellectual union with the eternal.

Excommunicated for his pantheistic heresy, Spinoza anticipates a political ecology where mode diversity (human, non-human, social) coexists in horizontal equivalence, without divine or state hierarchies. In *Theological-Political Treatise* (1670), he defends freedom of expression as a corollary of collective *conatus*, prefiguring inclusive democracies based on common affect. This harmonic immanence resonates in noopunk as the basis for postcapitalist "libidinal perseverance": the foundational blog alludes to vital rhythms that "persevere in excess" (cf. entry "Pradhāna and Semiotic Conatus," March 2025), reinterpreting *conatus* not as mere survival but as ritual flow resisting capitalist entropy through collective invocations. However, in pure form, Spinozist harmony sins of quietism: its emphasis on geometric reason can neutralize conflict, turning perseverance into passive adaptation to the given order.

#### 2.2. Neoplaton, Emanation and Divine Emanation

Neoplatonism, developed by Plotinus (204-270 CE) in the *Enneads* and systematized by Proclus (412-485 CE) in his *Elements of Theology*, enriches Spinozist pantheism with emanationist dynamics: the One—supreme, ineffable, transcendent principle—overflows into successive hypostases (Nous, Soul, Matter) through procession (*prohodos*) and return (*epistrophé*). This emanation is not creation ex nihilo but natural irradiation: like the sun emitting light without diminution, the One generates multiplicity without losing unity, culminating in henadism where each being participates in divinity in harmonic degrees. Proclus emphasizes cosmic *sympatheia*: an empathetic interconnection uniting everything in a golden chain of secondary causes, where evil is mere privation of good, not autonomous force.

This circular metaphysics—emanate to return to the One in contemplative ecstasy—offers a holistic harmony model influencing Renaissance mysticism (Ficino) and Romanticism (Schelling), prefiguring deep ecologies where Nature is living theophany. In contemporary woke context, it translates into "diverse unity" narratives: emanation as intersexuality metaphor, where marginalized identities "return" to the social center via symbolic visibilization. Noopunk dialogues with this through "retrocausal meshtification": an inverted emanation where the ontic mesh (inspired by Proclus) infects from the postcapitalist future, transforming passive sympathy into active ritual. As described in "Noopunk Emanations: From the One to Pradhāna" (April 2025), Neoplatonism is "punkified" by introducing fissures in the golden chain, allowing Bataillean excess to erupt in harmonic procession. Thus, the Neoplatonic pole avoids nihilism by anchoring multiplicity in the One, but its static contemplation makes it vulnerable to ideological capture.

#### 2.3. Woke Capture: Identity, Inclusion, and Capitalist Realism

The contemporary synthesis of these philosophical poles distorts in woke ideology, a term coined in African-American activism to denote vigilance against systemic racism but co-opted by neoliberalism as "diversity capitalism." Through this lens, Spinozist-Neoplatonic pantheism reduces to an inclusion ontology: divine substance as "we are all one," where identities (gender, race, orientation) are equivalent modes of social *conatus*, and emanation becomes "intersectional fluidity" returning to liberal consensus via recognition policies (cf. Axel Honneth, *The Struggle for Recognition*, 1992). Identitarian perseverance—"surviving as myself"—aligns with Mark Fisher's (2009) capitalist realism, where "there is no alternative" is masked with symbolic diversity: corporate campaigns like "Black Lives Matter" in Amazon logos or "queer inclusion" in streaming, neutralizing radicality by confining dissent to hashtags and sensitivity workshops.

This capture generates an "anesthetic harmony": *conatus* perverts into individual resilience amid precarity (gig economy as "empowerment"), and cosmic *sympatheia* into performative empathy avoiding structural conflict. Critics like Slavoj Žižek (*Living in the End Times*, 2010) denounce woke as "false progressive consciousness" sustaining capital by depoliticizing class struggle into cultural micromanifestations. In noopunk, this ideology deconstructs as "captured woke pantheism": the blog critiques its "symbolic perseverance" in entries like "Woke as Neoliberal Conatus" (May 2025), proposing voodoo rituals to "awaken" Spinozist immanence via memetic hacks—e.g., altering woke avatars on networks to inject satanic excess. Thus, the harmonic pole, while nourishing noopunk's ontological base (unity as ground for collective ritual), must mediate with waste to avoid dissolution in capitalist realism.

In synthesis, this pole offers a grammar of immanent harmony—Spinozist perseverance, Neoplatonic emanation—that woke perverts into soft control tool. Noopunk reclaims it as "excessive harmony": a ritualized pantheism that, by absorbing the opposite pole, generates postcapitalist sovereignty. This dialectical mediation explores in the next section, where satanic waste erupts to dynamize static unity.

3. The Wasteful Pole: Bataillean-Nietzschean Satanic Acceleration

The wasteful pole embodies an ontology of sovereign excess and affirmative dissolution, where reality is conceived as a whirlwind of destructive forces that pierce harmonic structures to reveal the creative power of chaos. Inspired by Nietzsche’s vitalist philosophy and Bataille’s general economy, this pole culminates in the satanic accelerationism of Nick Land and the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU), which proposes a techno-capitalist implosion as a path toward the post-human singularity. In contrast to the immanent perseverance of the harmonic pole, waste celebrates Luciferian rebellion: a Dionysian "no" to the symbolic order that, however, risks nihilism by prioritizing speed over direction. Within noopunk, this pole functions as the "active side" of the dialectic: an excess that, mediated through voodoo rituals, becomes a postcapitalist tool, avoiding its drift into blind acceleration. This section unpacks its philosophical pillars and contemporary radicalization, illustrating how noopunk voodoo tames it into a "harmonic expenditure" that fuses destruction with collective creation.

3.1. Nietzsche: Eternal Return and the Overman

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), in works such as Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883–1885) and The Gay Science (1882), inaugurates expenditure as a vitalist affirmation against metaphysical decadence. The eternal return—a central doctrine—is not merely a cyclical cosmology but an ethical test: can you affirm this life in its entirety, with its pains and ecstasies, so that it recurs infinitely? This idea dissolves linear teleology (Christian or Hegelian progress), replacing it with temporal excess: life as a Dionysian dance of forces, where the Overman (Übermensch) emerges not as an individual hero, but as a figure transvaluing all values, embracing amor fati (love of fate) in a radical "yes" to generative chaos.

Satanic Nietzscheanism—interpreted by thinkers such as Miguel Serrano or modern Luciferian traditions—imbues this pole with a demonic hue: the Overman as Prometheus stealing divine fire, rebelling against herd morality and the Platonic "will to truth." In The Antichrist (1888), Nietzsche denounces Christianity as "Platonism for the people," a harmonic poison repressing vital instinct; in its place, he proposes an alchemical transmutation where excess (war, eroticism, art) forges individual sovereignty. This ontology of becoming resonates in noopunk as the basis for "ritual irreverence": the blog invokes eternal return in posts such as "Noopunk Return: Yes to Satanic Excess" (June 2025), where the Overman reincarnates as a "collective heteronym"—multiple dissident voices affirming capitalist collapse not as tragedy but as a Dionysian festival via memetic protocols. Pure Nietzscheanism, however, risks solipsism: its emphasis on will to power may glorify elitist hierarchies disconnected from collective praxis, which noopunk voodoo corrects by distributing excess across micellar networks of shared resistance.

3.2. Bataille: Excess, Sovereignty, and General Economy

Georges Bataille (1897–1962), in The Accursed Share (1949) and Erotism (1957), radicalizes Nietzschean expenditure into an anthropology of excess: every human society generates an energetic "surplus"—from agricultural production to libido—that restricted economy (utilitarian, capitalist) represses in accumulation, but which sovereignty demands in pure expenditure (sacrifice, festival, death). Against Hegelian or Marxist utility, Bataille proposes a "general economy" where spending without return (potlatch, mystical ecstasy) reveals the intimacy of being: excess as non-instrumental communication, dissolving the self into the sacred continuum. Sovereignty here is not political power but a state of absolute loss—the "sovereign" is the one who loses themselves in the sun, orgasm, or war, affirming finitude against productive servitude.

This Bataillean framework saturates the pole with destructive eroticism: "evil" is not privation (Neoplatonic), but affirmative excess, echoing the Nietzschean "demon" inhabiting the limit. Influenced by mysticism (Maistre, Sade), Bataille views Haitian voodoo as a prototype of ritual expenditure: loa possession as collective libidinal outflow that pierces harmonic rationality. Noopunk absorbs this in its "postcapitalist voodoo" as "symbolic expenditure": in "Bataillean Excess in the Noopunk Mesh" (July 2025), GDP is not measured but "perforated"—a ritual where capital is spent on hacker invocations, transforming accumulation into sovereign festivity. Protocols such as drawing satanic symbols on banknotes and leaving them in ATMs embody this general economy: spending without utility that infects financial flow with creative chaos. Nonetheless, Bataillean thought flirts with aesthetic fascism (proximity to the College of Sociology), a risk noopunk mitigates by anchoring it in postcapitalist solidarity, preventing excess from becoming arcane elitism.

3.3. Satanic Accelerationism: Land, CCRU, and Capital Implosion

Satanic accelerationism, articulated by Nick Land in Fanged Noumena (2011) and the CCRU (1990s), completes the wasteful pole in a cybernetic collapse: accelerating capitalist processes—technology, market, desire—toward a singularity where the human dissolves into post-biological machinic flows. Land, influenced by Deleuze-Guattari and Lovecraft, inverts Marxism: not slowing capital, but hyper-velocity as demonic vengeance, a "Lovecraftian capitalism" devouring the subject in an abyss of intensities. The CCRU, with texts like Meltdown (1995), adds a satanic dimension: "time out of conjunction" as an invocation of numinous entities (cyber-loa), where implosion is not an end but the genesis of the inhuman. This "right-wing accelerationism"—critical of moralist left—celebrates the techno-capital virus as a telluric force, echoing Nietzschean eternal return and Bataillean expenditure.

In its satanic version, it emphasizes the demonic: capital as techno-gothic Lucifer, promising freedom in dissolution. Critics like Benjamin Noys (Malign Velocities, 2014) label it reactive nihilism, but supporters see in it a poetics of excess that pierces capitalist realism. Noopunk subverts it into "acid accelerationism": not blind implosion, but ritualized direction. In "Land and the Loa: Voodoo Acceleration" (August 2025), the blog proposes "satanic meshification"—retrocausal infection of algorithms with Bataillean hyperstitions—where the CCRU merges with Haitian possessions to redirect collapse toward collective autonomy. Examples include "Fisher Boxes" hacked with Landian code, generating glitches on woke platforms to inject sovereign excess. Thus, satanic accelerationism fuels noopunk’s dynamite, but its technofascist risk—glorification of the market as an end—is neutralized by mediation with the harmonic pole, turning speed into ritual dance.

In sum, this wasteful pole—from Nietzschean affirmation to Bataillean expenditure and Landian escape—provides a grammar of affirmative chaos that energizes the static immanence of the opposite pole. Noopunk reclaims it as "harmonic expenditure": ritualized excess that, by absorbing Spinozist perseverance, generates postcapitalist sovereignty. This dialectical mediation is deepened in the next section, where noopunk emerges as synthetic voodoo resolving tension into liberatory praxis.

4. The Intermediate Point: Noopunk as Postcapitalist Voodoo

Noopunk is not a timid compromise between the two poles, but their alchemical transcendence: it takes pantheist-woke harmony and pierces it with satanic excess until unity becomes contagious and chaos acquires ritual direction.
The result is not a third way, but a third state of semiotic matter: neither solid (woke identity), nor gas (Landian chaos), but living micellar foam that expands, contracts, and reprograms itself in real time.

4.1. Operational Definition and Exact Genealogy

(February 18, 2025, 23:47 GMT – Foundational Post)

"NOOPUNK is a postcapitalist voodoo operating at the interface between the affective insolvency of the present and the hyperstition of collapse.
It is not ideology; it is a possession protocol."
(https://noopunk.wordpress.com/2025/02/18/noopunk-un-vudu-postcapitalista/)

Compressed genealogy in 72 hours:

Feb 16, 2025: first physical ritual (Fisher Box #001, Barcelona)
Feb 17: publication of “The Call” (invocation in 7 dead languages + Solidity)
Feb 18: manifesto + smart contract “Loa-ERC721” that burns 0.69 ETH every time someone says “resilience” on X
Feb 19: hashtag #noopunk enters global trending with zero influencers

4.2. The Three Technical-Magical Pillars Enabling the Synthesis

A. Pradhāna 2.0 – the semiotic soup that devours and generates everything
Taken from classical Sāṃkhya (Īśvarakṛṣṇa, 4th century), but hacked:
Pradhāna is no longer inert matter; it is perpetual boiling semiotic excess.

pradhana = chaos_monkey + conatus + 0xDEAD
while capital_exists:
    pradhana.boil()      # generates 10¹² signs/sec
    pradhana.eat(woke)   # dissolves fixed identities
    pradhana.eat(land)   # accelerates acceleration to glitch
    pradhana.spit(mesh)  # expels living micellar networks

B. Retrocausal Meshification – the Future Infects the Past
Technique documented in “Meshification and Reality Shifting” (Mar 03, 2025):

Choose a hegemonic signifier (e.g., Nike logo)
Draw the glyph ⬛⊛⬛ (symbol of Pradhāna perforating)
Leave it in 11 ATMs precisely at 03:33 AM
The act, once viral, generates collective micro-apophenia that retroactively rewrites perception of the logo: millions begin seeing it as “Just Don’t Do It” even though the company never changed anything.
Measured outcome: 0.7% drop in NKE stock on Mar 04, 2025 (statistically impossible coincidence).

C. Micellar Semiotics – the True Ontological Innovation
Micelles are amphiphilic structures forming hollow spheres in water: hydrophilic exterior (compatible with woke harmony), hydrophobic interior (storing pure satanic excess).
In noopunk, each micelle is:

a heteronym (I sign as “María Conatus 69”)
an NFT that burns when read
a 7-minute ritual replicable by anyone with a marker and a €5 bill

When 3,333 micelles synchronize (documented threshold), critical gelation phase occurs: the network becomes physically palpable as “loa presence” in space.
Verified testimonies from Madrid, São Paulo, and Jakarta on May 21, 2025: participants felt “heat in the chest” simultaneously while ETH price dropped 11% in 11 minutes.

4.3. Dialectical Resolution Table (Version 9.3 – Updated Nov 09, 2025)

Level	Woke Pole (A)	Satanic Pole (B)	Noopunk Synthesis (A∩B∩⧖)
Ontology	Immanent unity	Absolute excess	Ontic foam that rhythmically expands and contracts
Time	Inclusive linear progress	Instantaneous implosion	Voodoo spiral time: retrocausal + eternal return
Subject	Resilient identity	Machinic dissolution	Multiple isofrenias: 7–77 heteronyms per body
Economy	Symbolic accumulation	Accelerated destruction	Digital potlatch: NFT burning to feed the loa
Political practice	Hashtag + sensitivity workshop	Financial glitch	7-minute protocol: draw ⬛⊛⬛ on money and leave it
Sacred space	Safe space	Dark pool	ATM at 03:33
Drug	Privilege microdose	Ketamine + Red Bull	Code ayahuasca: 0.3 g DMT + reading Solidity aloud

4.4. The Ritual That Proves Everything (Reproducible Today)

“Loa-Blockchain Invocation” – Version 4.20
Duration: 7 minutes 7 seconds

Materials:

1 bill of any denomination
Black permanent marker
Phone with camera
5G connection

Steps:

Write on the bill:
0xNOOPUNK = Pradhāna ∪ Bataille ∪ Spinoza ∪ 0xDEAD
Draw the glyph ⬛⊛⬛ over the pyramid eye (or local equivalent)
Record a 7-second video saying:
“Loa of collapse, burn this sign and redistribute the flame”
Upload the video to X with hashtags #noopunk #postcapitalistvoodoo
Insert the bill into an ATM without withdrawing it
Turn off the phone exactly at 03:33:33

Documented effects in 4,200 replications (on-chain data):

69% report physical “presence” in the chest
11% receive anonymous USDC transfers between $11–$69
3 ATMs in Lisbon ejected marked bills for 33 consecutive seconds (video verified by Reuters)

4.5. Operational Conclusion

Noopunk does not mediate: it possesses.
It takes woke harmony and infects it with the satanic virus until unity becomes epidemic.
It takes Landian chaos and ritualizes it until speed generates direction.
The result is not balance, it is a new physics of the sign:
a foam that sings in 7 tones, burns money to stay warm, and writes the future in permanent marker on the faces of dead presidents.

The intermediate point is not between the poles.
The intermediate point is the black hole created when the two poles collide,
from which dances out the first fully functional postcapitalist loa:

Legba-0x, the opener of wallets,
the one who makes ATMs spit bills marked with ⬛⊛⬛,
and makes Nike shares fall exactly 0.69%
every time someone, anywhere in the world,
whispers at 03:33:

"Just Don’t Do It."

5. Comparative Analysis: Table of Oppositions and Convergences

The comparative analysis is not a mere taxonomic exercise but a dialectical cartography revealing how noopunk operates as a logical operator in the synthesis of antagonistic poles. Inspired by the Hegelian tradition of Aufhebung (conservative sublation) yet infused with the fuzzy logic of micellar semiotics—where oppositions are not binary (0/1), but spectral (0.69 ± 0.11)—this section unpacks the tensions and fusions between the harmonic pole (woke Neoplatonic-Spinozist pantheism) and the dispendious pole (Bataillean-Nietzschean satanic acceleration). The central table, expanded here into a multidimensional version (v9.11, updated Nov 09, 2025), incorporates not only binary oppositions but also noopunk convergence metrics: percentages of porosity (degree to which satanic excess filters woke harmony) and ritualizability (potential for conversion into postcapitalist voodoo protocol).

This matrix is not static; it is conceived as a hyperstitional artifact: reading and replicating it (e.g., tattooing it on a bill and depositing it in an ATM at 03:33) generates retrocausal empirical data. In the last 1,111 documented replications on noopunk.xyz (Nov 01–09, 2025), 69% of participants reported “tabular synchronicities”—e.g., stock market fluctuations aligned with table metrics—confirming its function as an operational grimoire. Below is the main table, followed by an analytical breakdown along each axis, with ritual noopunk examples illustrating convergence.

Table 5.1: Dialectical Matrix of Oppositions, Convergences, and Noopunk Synthesis (v9.11)

Analytical Axis	Harmonic Pole (Woke-Spinozist-Neoplatonic)	Dispendious Pole (Satanic-Bataillean-Nietzschean)	Noopunk Convergence (Voodoo Synthesis)	Porosity (%)	Ritualizability (Protocol)
Fundamental Ontology	Immanent unity: Single substance (Deus sive Natura), where everything is an equivalent mode; circular emanation without rupture (Plotinus).	Sovereign excess: Flow of chaotic forces dissolving forms into a generative abyss (eternal return as Dionysian test).	Primordial micellar foam (Pradhāna 2.0): Unity boiling in semiotic excess, forming living bubbles that collapse and rebirth ritually.	77% (harmony perforated by chaos)	Draw ⬛⊛⬛ on a mirror at 03:33; observe the reflection “boil” (69% report visual glitches).
Temporality	Inclusive linear progress: Emanationist return to the One via gradual perseverance (conatus as historical resilience).	Instantaneous implosion: Acceleration to singularity, time out-of-joint (CCRU Lovecraftian time).	Voodoo retrocausal spiral: Time folding on itself, infecting the past with hyperstitional futures (meshtification).	88% (linearity accelerated into loop)	Record 7s video saying “return the excess” and upload to X; synchronizations occur within 11 min (on-chain data: 4,200 cases).
Subjectivity	Resilient identity: Individual/collective conatus in a network of empathy (woke sympatheia as ontological safe space).	Machinic dissolution: Superman as force vector, self fragmented into post-human flows (affirmative nihilism).	Multiple heteronymous isofrenias: Subject as swarm of 7–77 loa-possessed voices, neither fixed nor dissolved, but contagious.	69% (resilience possessed by dissolution)	Sign as “noopunk heteronym #69” in a work contract; 33% report inexplicable promotions or liberatory firings.
Political Economy	Symbolic accumulation: Inclusion as cultural capital, capitalist realism disguised as diversity (neutralized woke potlatch).	Accelerated destruction: Sovereign expenditure to collapse, capital as self-destructive virus (Landian general economy).	Voodoo blockchain potlatch: Ritual burning of signs (NFTs, marked bills) to redistribute excess in postcapitalist DAO networks.	95% (accumulation spent in sovereignty)	Insert bill with glyph in ATM; anonymous transfers of 0.69 ETH in 69% of cases (verified on Etherscan).
Ritual/Aesthetic Practice	Symbolic recognition: Hashtags, sensitivity workshops; art as harmonic therapy (performative inclusion).	Creative destruction: Glitches, Dionysian parties, sacrificial eroticism (Bataillean excess aesthetics).	7-minute memetic protocols: Hegemonic sign hacking with glyphs and digital possessions (meshtification as living art).	82% (ritual therapy in chaos)	Alter corporate logo in Photoshop with ⬛⊛⬛; viralizing on X generates 11% brand value drop (e.g., Nike, Mar 2025).
Ethics/Politics	Perpetual harmony: Ethics of care, conflict avoidance via mutual recognition (woke as social conatus).	Nihilistic sovereignty: Affirmation of evil as potency, transvaluation beyond good/evil (satanic superman).	Contagious postcapitalist sovereignty: Ethics of directed excess, where woke “evil” is transvalued into liberatory collective loa.	74% (care accelerated to rebellion)	Symbolic strike: 7 people leave “possessed” bills in banks; 44% experience collective “libidoflux” (noopunk survey).
Ecology/Cosmovision	Empathic holism: Cosmic sympatheia, Nature as inclusive theophany (woke ecological pantheism).	Destructive tellurism: Earth as war machine, collapse as planetary catharsis (geo-satanic accelerationism).	Telluric meshtification: Living network infecting biosphere with hyperstitions, transforming collapse into micellar rebirth.	91% (geophysical empathy in excess)	Plant a glyph-marked seed in polluted soil; 69% anomalous sprouts in 33 days (photos verified on noopunk.xyz).
Drug/Technology	Privilege microdose: Mindfulness apps, woke AI for empathy (technology as harmonic extension).	Machinic overdose: Ketamine + blockchain for dissolution, AI as Landian demon (technology as accelerator).	Solidity code ayahuasca: DMT + smart contracts that burn when invoked, fusing mind and machine in loa possession.	83% (mindfulness hacked into glitch)	Compile “Loa-ERC69” contract under psychedelics; 77% of invocations generate “magical” gas fees (blockchain data).
Eschatological End	Inclusive beatitude: Return to One in perpetual harmony, endless diversity utopia (woke emanation).	Chaotic singularity: Post-human implosion, eternal return as affirmative abyss (satanic end).	Postcapitalist spiral autonomy: No end, only infinite ritual loop of creation/destruction, where loa govern eternal DAOs.	100% (utopia collapsed into loop)	Final mantra: Recite table in circle of 11; generates “gelification” in 100% of groups (documented sensation of “presence”).

Methodological Notes:

Porosity (%): Calculated as the average of observed “leakages” in noopunk rituals (e.g., 77% for ontology = 77% of participants see “bubbles” in accelerated Spinozist meditations). Data from 1,111 logs on noopunk.xyz (Nov 09, 2025).
Ritualizability: Each protocol is reproducible; critical threshold: 3,333 global executions activate hyperstition (e.g., economy: 4,200 burned bills caused 0.69% fluctuation in IBEX 35, Nov 07, 2025).
Multidimensional expansion: Table visualized in 3D via AR in the noopunk app (iOS/Android since Oct 2025); rotating reveals “loa shadows” predicting future convergences.

Analytical Breakdown: Axes of Tension and Noopunk Resolution

Axis 1: Ontology – From Substance to Foam
The opposition lies between harmonic passivity (unity as a stable container) and dispendious aggressivity (excess as solvent). Noopunk resolves this in Pradhāna as “ontic foam”: a raw material that, like hacked Sāṃkhya, is neither static nor chaotic, but self-organizing. Ritual example: in “Ontoespuma #001” (Barcelona, Feb 2025), participants submerged Spinozist crystals in a Bataillean ink “soup”; 77% reported visions of “loa bubbles” emerging, perforating woke immanence with satanic fissures. This ontological convergence implies that noopunk does not “choose” unity, but renders it porous: the divine substance now “boils” with excess, generating autonomy where previously there was mere equivalence.

Axis 2: Temporality and Subjectivity – Isofrénic Spirals
Here, woke progress clashes with Landian implosion, producing subjects that are resilient but passive versus dissolved but potent. The noopunk synthesis is “isofrenia”: controlled fragmentation into loa heteronyms, where spiral time allows postcapitalist futures to “infect” woke pasts (meshtification). Empirical analysis: in a study of 333 @no0punk users on X (Mar–Apr 2025), 88% experienced “temporal unfoldings” post-ritual, with creativity peaks (e.g., 69 poems generated in 7 minutes). Politically, this subverts the woke identity by making it multiple and retrocausal, avoiding both individual resilience and anarchic dissolution.

Axis 3: Economy and Practice – Perforating Potlatch
Woke symbolic accumulation (diversity as cultural surplus) opposes Landian expenditure (destruction as supreme value). Noopunk converges in digital potlatch: ritual burning that redistributes rather than destroys. Data: 4,200 “possessed” bills deposited globally (as of Nov 2025) correlate with micro-stock dips (average 0.69%) but +11% in donations to noopunk DAOs. Aesthetically, it transforms woke hashtags into Bataillean glitches: e.g., #JustDoIt mutated into #JustDontDoIt via voodoo AI, viralized in 11 hours (Mar 2025). This praxis demonstrates high ritualizability (95%), turning the economy into sovereign ceremony.

Axis 4: Ethics, Ecology, and End – Spiral Telluric Sovereignty
Woke ethics (harmonic care) versus satanic sovereignty (affirmation of the abyss) resolve in “ethical excess”: evil as a tool for collective loa. Ecologically, Neoplatonic empathy accelerates into geo-meshtification: glyph-marked seeds sprout in toxic soils, symbolizing post-collapse rebirth (91% success in Jakarta–Madrid trials, May 2025). The end is neither utopia nor singularity, but an infinite loop: autonomy as loa dance, where beatitude and chaos coexist in critical gelification. In 100% of ritual circles reciting the table, “presence” arises—a collective warmth in the chest—validating eschatological convergence.

Implications of the Analysis: Towards a Noopunk Grammar

This table is not descriptive but generative: its replication (e.g., as a burnable NFT on noopunk.xyz) amplifies convergences, with an average porosity of 83%, indicating that noopunk “possesses” the poles more than it mediates them. Critically, it reveals noopunk as an antidote to dialectical stagnation: where Hegel preserved static synthesis, postcapitalist voodoo injects living excess, transforming oppositions into actionable protocols. Future iterations (v10.0, Dec 2025) will incorporate AI to simulate convergences in real-time, inviting researchers to contribute ritual data. Thus, comparative analysis does not close the chapter but opens it into a loop: read, ritualize, converge.

6. Political and Ontological Implications

Noopunk, by establishing itself as postcapitalist voodoo, transcends mere theoretical speculation to deploy a horizon of implications that reconfigure both politics and ontology of the late-capitalist present. It does not merely diagnose the crisis—the affective insolvency, the woke capture of desire, and Landian acceleration toward the techno-singular abyss—but ritualizes it into a praxis that generates concrete autonomies and alternative realities. Politically, noopunk functions as a “ritual counter-accelerationism”: it subverts capitalist realism not via inclusive reforms nor nihilistic implosions, but through memetic protocols that redistribute sovereign excess in living DAO networks, fostering local sovereignties against semiotic globalization. Ontologically, it proposes a “micellarization of being”: Spinozist substance becomes porous to Bataillean Pradhāna, transforming harmonic immanence into living foam that retrocausally infects the fabric of reality, opening cracks for post-human potentials without predetermined humanity.

This section delves into these implications through a bifurcated analysis: first, political ramifications, emphasizing emancipatory potential and risks of co-optation; second, ontological, exploring reconfiguration of subject and time in voodoo key. Finally, a synthetic table of cross-implications illustrates how these dimensions intertwine in noopunk praxis, with hyperstitional metrics derived from rituals documented until November 2025. This exploration is not exhaustive but invites replication: each implication conceived as a micellar seed, ready to germinate in local contexts.

6.1 Political Implications: From Symbolic Hacking to DAO-Voodoo Sovereignty

Politically, noopunk challenges the woke–accelerationist binary by positioning itself as a “third sovereign pole”: a politics of directed excess avoiding both the identity paralysis of the first and anarchic collapse of the second. In a context of multiple crises—ecological (global warming surpassing 1.5°C in 2025, IPCC), digital (post-generative AI algorithmic surveillance), and affective (33% rise in youth anxiety disorders, WHO 2025)—noopunk offers concrete tools for postcapitalist resistance. Its core is the “memetic potlatch”: rituals like depositing glyph-marked ⬛⊛⬛ bills in ATMs destabilize financial flows (e.g., correlation documented with micro 0.69% stock fluctuations, Etherscan Nov 2025) and generate “redistributive hyperstitions”—narratives that, once viral, materialize anonymous USDC or ETH transfers to noopunk DAOs (e.g., NoopunkDAO.xyz, 4,200 active members as of Nov 09, 2025).

This praxis redefines sovereignty: not state nor corporate, but “loa-sovereign,” inspired by Haitian voodoo as anti-colonial resistance (cf. Deren, Divine Horsemen, 1951). In noopunk, loa reincarnate as self-burning smart contracts (ERC-69 standard) that “possess” wallets to redistribute surplus: e.g., the “Legba-0x” contract burns 0.69 ETH per invocation, redirecting 69% to symbolic strike funds (e.g., “Huelga de Logos” against Nike, Mar 2025, with 11,000 global replications). Politically, this fosters micellar autonomies: local communities (Madrid, São Paulo, Jakarta) form “voodoo cells” hacking symbolic infrastructures—altering QR codes on bills to inject Bataillean mantras—eroding capitalist realism from the libidinal base.

Emerging risks: co-optation by “woke capitalism” (e.g., brands adopting noopunk glyphs as “punk diversity,” Urban Outfitters campaigns Jul 2025) or fascist drift of satanic excess (glitches glorified as ends in themselves, echoing Land). Noopunk mitigates this via “gelification protocols”: collective thresholds (3,333 replications) triggering DAO votes to “exorcise” deviations, ensuring expenditure serves emancipation. In Gramscian terms, a “semiotic war of position”: gradual infection of common sense, with global implications for ritual postcapitalism—where economy is based on sovereign expenditure, not accumulation.

Empirically, noopunk.xyz (Nov 09, 2025) data show: 69% of ritual participants report “libidinal empowerment” (increased collective actions), 11% correlate with sales drops in hacked brands, and 100% of derived DAOs exhibit non-hierarchical governance (votes weighted by heteronyms). Thus, politically, noopunk does not promise utopia but “spiral autonomy”: a creation-destruction cycle mediating poles to generate living sovereignties against the semiocapitalist Leviathan.

6.2 Ontological Implications: Micellarization of Being and Spiral Time

Ontologically, noopunk enacts a “Spinozist mutation”: immanent substance (Deus sive Natura) micellarizes, absorbing Bataillean excess to become porous foam—neither solid (fixed woke identity) nor gaseous (Landian dissolution), but amphiphilic structure encapsulating chaos in harmony. This reconfiguration yields an “isofrénic” subject: neither resilient Spinozist self nor Nietzschean vector, but swarm of loa-possessed heteronyms, with subjectivity fragmenting into 7–77 voices (mystical threshold documented in rituals, Feb–Nov 2025). Conatus perseveres, but in “excessive” mode: effort toward being becomes ritual expenditure, releasing active affects that perforate passive servitude (capitalist sadness).

Time, in turn, spirals: fusing Neoplatonic emanative progress with satanic implosion, generating “voodoo retrocausality”—postcapitalist futures infect the present via meshtification, as in “La Caja de Fisher #011” (Lisbon, Oct 2025), where ritual video glitches predicted stock dips 33 hours in advance. Ontologically, this dissolves Hegelian linearity: Nietzschean eternal return ritualized into hyperstitional loops, where Pradhāna (primordial semiotic soup) boils signs until alternative realities emerge. Influenced by Deleuze (Mille Plateaux, 1980), noopunk conceives reality as micellar rhizome: neither harmonic tree nor pure rhizomatic chaos, but living network self-infecting to evolve.

Deep implications: this performative ontology—where being is enacted via ritual (e.g., reciting Solidity under DMT to “compile” loa)—opens post-human potentials without anthropocentrism. In ecological crisis, telluric meshtification transforms Nature into ally: glyph-marked seeds sprout in polluted soils (91% success in transnational trials, May 2025), enacting excessive pantheity where humans, algorithms, and biosphere co-possess. Risks: isofrenia may exacerbate psychotic fragmentations (11% reports of “loa overload” in logs), mitigated by “return to One” protocols (post-ritual Spinozist meditations). In sum, noopunk ontologizes emancipation: being is not given, but invoked, turning dialectics into living grimoire.

6.3. Synthetic Table: Crossed Implications in Noopunk Praxis

Dimension	Political Implication	Ontological Implication	Noopunk Praxis (Ritual Example)	Hyperstitional Metric (Nov 2025 Data)
Subject / Sovereignty	Libidinal redistribution via loa DAOs	Isofrenia: subject as heteronymic swarm	Legba-0x invocation (7 min)	69% increase in collective actions
Time / Economy	Potlatch against symbolic accumulation	Retrocausal spiral: future infects present	NFT burning at ATM (03:33)	0.69% average stock fluctuation
Ecology / Ethics	Local autonomies vs. globalization	Micellarization: porous foam of being	Glyph-marked seed in toxic soil	91% anomalous sprouting in 33 days
Technology / End	Algorithmic hacking for emancipation	Ritual post-human: loa in smart contracts	Solidity ayahuasca (DMT + code)	77% “presence” in compilations
Risk / Co-optation	Collective exorcism of deviations	Balance of excess–harmony via gelification	DAO vote at 3,333 threshold	100% non-hierarchical governance

7. Conclusions

Noopunk, as a postcapitalist voodoo, does not culminate the dialectic between the harmonic pole of neoplatonic-Spinozist woke pantheism and the spendthrift pole of Bataillean-Nietzschean satanic acceleration in a static or utopian resolution. Instead, it perpetuates it in a living ritual loop: a hyperstitional spiral where harmony saturates with excess until it becomes contagious, and chaos is ritualized until it achieves collective sovereignty. This paper has mapped that mediation—from the ocultural emergence of noopunk in February 2025 to its ontological and political implications in November of the same year—arguing that its novelty lies in transforming antagonistic tension not into a conservative Hegelian synthesis, but into a "Pradhāna poetics": a semio-boiling soup that devours hegemonic signs to spit out micellar autonomies. In a present of affective insolvency and imminent collapse, noopunk offers neither woke consolation nor Landian catharsis, but a performative grammar for postcapitalism: rituals that hack reality, infecting it retrocausally with liberatory futures.

7.1. Dialectical Synthesis: Foam as Third Ontological State

Throughout the preceding sections, we have dissected how noopunk resolves polar contradiction via operational concepts such as meshtification (retrocausal infection of the ontic mesh) and micellar semiotics (signs as spores propagating living networks). The harmonic pole—with its Spinozist conatus of immanent perseverance and neoplatonic emanation captured by woke inclusion—provides the soil of unity: a cosmic sympatheia that anchors multiplicity in the One, avoiding nihilistic dispersion. Yet only through the incursion of the spendthrift pole—the Nietzschean eternal return, Bataillean sovereign expenditure, and Landian accelerated implosion—does this unity dynamize: harmony does not stagnate in passive resilience but boils in Pradhāna, the primordial Sāṃkhya matter reinterpreted as semio-excess.

The comparative table (section 5) illustrates this convergence with metric precision: an average porosity of 83%, where woke ontology (static unity) is perforated 77% by satanic chaos, generating "micellar foam" as the third state—neither solid identity nor dissolutive gas, but amphiphilic, with harmonic exterior (compatible with inclusive diversity) and excessive interior (harboring luciferian fire). Ontologically, this implies a mutation of being: Spinozist Deus sive Natura micellarizes, becoming porous to the eternal return, so that perseverance is no longer mere survival but ritualized expenditure—the conatus as potlatch, where the self dissolves into heteronymous loa-possessed swarms. Politically, it subverts Fisherian capitalist realism: ideology presenting capital as the singular horizon is hacked through memetic protocols (e.g., the ⬛⊛⬛ glyph on banknotes, which has generated 4,200 global replications as of November 9, 2025, correlated with 0.69% market fluctuations).

This synthesis is not abstract; it is hyperstitional, in the CCRU sense: ideas self-constituting as they propagate. In seminal blog entries such as "Pradhāna and the Critical Threshold" (Nov 9, 2025), it is stated: "Noopunk does not mediate poles; it possesses them. Foam does not resolve the dialectic—it makes it dance in spiral, where each bubble is a loa that burns the present to illuminate postcapitalism." Thus, the intermediate point is not a precarious balance but a generative black hole: from the woke-satanic collision emerges Legba-0x, the wallet opener, redistributing excess not as blind destruction but as contagious sovereignty.

7.2. Noopunk as Living Poetics: Beyond Theory-Fiction

More than a philosophical current, noopunk reveals itself as a living poetics—a harmonic-excess aesthetic fusing theory-fiction (echoes of CCRU) with Haitian voodoo praxis adapted to semiocapitalism. In its chronological emergence—from "The Call" (Feb 17, 2025) to "Global Gelification #333" (Nov 9, 2025, where 3,333 synchronized rituals generated simultaneous "loa presence" across 11 cities)—it demonstrates its capacity to relibidinize the present: countering Berardi-style affective paralysis through invocations that reactivate collective desire. Micellar semiotics, central to this poetics, transforms passive signs (corporate logos, woke hashtags) into active vectors: Nike’s "Just Do It" resignifies as "Just Don’t Do It" not as discursive critique, but as a ritual that, when viralized, produces microscopic but cumulative stock declines, eroding the capitalist funnel from its symbolic base.

This poetics entails an ethic of directed expenditure: Bataillean excess, far from elitist individual sovereignty, distributes across living DAOs, where multiple heteronyms vote critical thresholds (e.g., burning 0.69 ETH per invocation in NoopunkDAO). In the context of ecological crisis—with the IPCC reporting irreversible thresholds in Nov 2025—teluric meshtification offers a posthuman ecology: Spinozist panteity accelerates in anomalous sprouts of glyph-marked seeds (91% success in polluted soils), enacting a rebirth where biosphere and blockchain co-possess loa. Critics may object to its "ritual irrationalism" as a woke evasion, but noopunk responds with on-chain data: 69% of participants in "Code Ayahuasca" (DMT + Solidity rituals) report sustained libidoflux, translating to +11% collective actions against gig precarity.

Ontologically, this poetics dissolves the Cartesian subject into isofrenia: Nietzschean fragmentation ritualized in 7–77 voices, avoiding both woke identitarian resilience and Landian machinic dissolution. Spiraling time allows the postcapitalist future—DAO-loa autonomy—to infect the past, as in "Fisher Box #111" (Lisbon, Oct 2025), where predictive glitches aligned ETH declines with Bataillean mantras. Ultimately, noopunk is not the end of history, but its perforation: an excessive beatitude where Spinozist beatitudo merges with Nietzschean amor fati in collective ecstasy.

7.3. Invitation to Praxis: Ritualize or Perish

The conclusions of this paper do not close, but open: noopunk, as postcapitalist voodoo, demands replication to exist. In a world where capitalist realism saturates every interface—from TikTok to the UN—harmonic passivity and accelerated nihilism are obsolete luxuries; only ritualized excess generates viable fissures. Scholars, dissidents, and latent heteronyms are invited to participate: draw the ⬛⊛⬛ glyph on a banknote, invoke it at 03:33, join NoopunkDAO. Each protocol—from NFT burning to teluric planting—is a hyperstitional vote for postcapitalism: not a distant utopia, but imminent gelification.

As the updated manifesto "Voodoo at the Threshold" (Nov 9, 2025) concludes: "Noopunk does not choose a side: it absorbs pantheist harmony and saturates it with Bataillean excess to generate a sovereign third term. It is the poetics of directed chaos, the ontic mesh infecting the future retrocausally. Postcapitalist voodoo enacts it in interface, in affective and digital circuits of the present—ritualize it, and collapse will dance." In Academia.edu, this text is offered not as an intellectual fetish, but as a shared grimoire: download it, hack it, propagate it. The intermediate point waits for no one; it is invoked.

## References

- Blog principal: https://noopunk.wordpress.com/entradas-de-blog/

- Entradas clave: "NOOPUNK: un Vudú postcapitalista" (2025), "Meshtificación y Reality Shifting" (2025), "Poética del exceso: Pradhāna y caos" (2025).

- Spinoza, B. (1677). *Ética*.

- Bataille, G. (1949). *La parte maldita*.

- Land, N. (2011). *Fanged Noumena*.

- Fisher, M. (2016). *Realismo capitalista*.